Other candidates have stated their opposition to all mandatory minimum sentences, but my position is more nuanced. I agree that mandatory minimum sentences can result in excessive punishment for drug offenses involving first offenders, the young, or individuals with limited criminal histories. In fact, the legislature has already addressed these issues; decreasing mandatory minimum sentences for drug offenses and substantially reducing the application of mandatory minimum school zone violations. To that end, if elected, I intend to focus on rehabilitating drug users and first offenders and providing them with an opportunity to re-enter society with the necessary tools to become productive citizens. Further, in all types of cases – as I have done throughout my career as a prosecutor – there should be an individual assessment of the merits, the people involved, and any mitigating circumstances, such as mental health and substance abuse issues. My administration would consider the people involved in cases, not just what is in black and white.

In more serious cases, however, mandatory minimum sentences send a message that certain conduct will not be tolerated; they provide prosecutors with leverage over violent and repeat offenders, which can result in longer sentences for dangerous individuals.